Your estate has no single country — and the countries share no single rule.

• Assets, heirs and testator are spread across several corridors, and each one’s rules pull the estate its own way.
• There is no inheritance or tax treaty between the jurisdictions involved — or it has been suspended.
• You can see the estate is at risk of stalling at the seam: double tax, frozen assets, a dispute over governing law.

What the House does

The House treats each jurisdiction neutrally — as one of the corridors through which capital passes. First it maps the conflict of rules in advance: where forced-heirship collides, where double tax arises, where assets may freeze. Then it builds a structure that carries the estate through that gap intact, rather than leaving it to the clash of national norms.

• A conflict map: which inheritance and tax rules of each corridor collide, and at what point.
• Identifying the gaps in advance — where there is no treaty, or where it is suspended — before the estate falls into them.
• A structure — a holding, a foundation or a trust — through which the estate passes as a single whole, not piecemeal.
• Protection against double taxation of the estate and against the freezing of assets at the seam between jurisdictions.
• A personal partner of the House who holds every corridor in one field of view, rather than one adviser per country.

What you get: a conflict map of inheritance and tax rules across 3+ jurisdictions with collision points · a register of gaps — where there is no treaty or it is suspended · a structure (holding, foundation or trust) that carries the estate whole · a memo on protection against double taxation and asset freezes

Why this way and not another

• The forced-heirship rules of different corridors contradict one another and rewrite the testator’s will.
• An estate that lies across several corridors falls under inheritance tax twice.
• With no treaty between jurisdictions — or with it suspended — assets can freeze at the seam.
• An adviser in one country sees their own corridor, but not the gap between it and the next.

What worries you — and the House’s answer

• “The estate will be taxed in two countries at once.” — The conflict of rules is mapped in advance, and the structure is built so the estate does not fall under double tax at the seam.
• “Assets will freeze because there is no treaty.” — The gaps between corridors are identified before the transfer, and capital is carried through them by the structure, not left to the clash of norms.
• “The countries’ rules will rewrite my will in different ways.” — The forced-heirship conflict between corridors is resolved in advance, and the estate passes as a single whole.

Where this leads

The gap between corridors is mapped, and the estate passes through it whole. Assets do not freeze at the seam, the estate is not taxed twice, and the conflict of rules is resolved before the transfer, not after. Capital that had no single country passes to the heirs as one body — even though the countries shared no single rule.