For Crypto Capital

The capital was made on-chain. It must now be held in a structure.

The wealth is real, but its form is not: the bank does not open the door, the regulator asks for the perimeter, the exchange of information comes on its own. The House moves crypto capital into a structure that the bank accepts and the regulator holds.

This is you if

There is wealth in digital assets, but no structure that the bank and the regulator recognise.
The source of funds is obvious to you, but not documented well enough to pass onboarding.
The VARA perimeter and the entry of CARF are on the horizon, and you want to meet them with a position, not a request.

The bank closes the door not to capital, but to an unproven source.
Provability is built before onboarding, not during it.

Settled positions for crypto capital

Five moves around digital wealth

IA structure for crypto capitalHolding and ownership of digital assets in a form the bank and the regulator read as clear: a settled position instead of a grey zone.→IIA clean source of fundsThe history of the capital documented for onboarding in advance: you enter the bank prepared, not on luck.→IIIBanking access for digital assetsOnboarding with a bank that works with crypto capital, coordinated by the House: from a rejected applicant to a client it understands.→IVThe VARA perimeter and licensingA regulatory landing for a digital business within a recognised perimeter, without guessing what the regulator will ask.→VReadiness for CARFAn assessment of exposure under the exchange of information on crypto assets and a target structure, closed before the first exchange.→

“We never judge.”

The House builds only defensible positions; what is not defensible, we name plainly.

Meet the regulator with a position, not a request.

A Diagnostic will show the exposure, the risks of the source and the options of structure for banking. Days, not months.

Set the House a task →